Depressive Disorder With Panic Attacks After Replacement of an Intrauterine Device Containing Levonorgestrel: A Case Report
/René Zeiss, Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Maximilian Gahr, Heiko Graf
Frontiers in Psychiatry
August 28, 2020
With this case, we strengthen previous observations regarding mood changes under LNG-IUS. Moreover, we illustrate that psychiatric symptoms may also occur as ADRs during the subsequent insertion. Thus, we emphasize that psychiatric symptoms have to be clearly communicated as ADRs to patients with LNG-IUS within a written informed consent and should be routinely examined by gynecologists.
Excerpts from Abstract
……Whereas most of these studies report psychiatric ADRs after the first implantation of the LNG-IUS, it has to be considered that these may also occur after replacement, even when psychiatric symptoms were not evident at the time of the initial insertion. A potential explanation for the development of psychiatric ADRs in subsequent LNG-IUS may rely on fluctuations of sex hormones throughout the female life cycle with changing windows of vulnerabilities for developing mood disorders. Thus, the reliable contraception for women remains a continual challenge. We present the case of a 41-year-old woman that used the LNG-IUS (Mirena®) for contraception over 5 years without any complaints. Within the first weeks after insertion of the second LNG-IUS, she developed a depressive syndrome and anxieties. An extensive somatic, including gynecological examination revealed no pathological findings and a mental disorder was suggested. Due to the patient´s request and the recommendation of her psychiatrist, the device was removed and led to a remission of her mental complaints up to a 6- and 12-months follow-up. Beyond the mood changes considerably affecting her quality of life, the patient raised the concerns that she has never been informed about potential ADRs on mental health and her remarks regarding the potential association between psychiatric symptoms and the LNG-IUS were considered as groundless.
…. The removal of the first and the insertion of the new LNG-IUS occurred on the same day. Within the first weeks after the insertion of the second device, she experienced an increasing psychomotor restlessness that was pronounced in the evening and during the night. She also reported from episodes of tachycardia and experienced an irregular heartbeat. Within the next 6 months, symptoms worsened and she developed sleep disturbances, anxiety in the night, emotional lability and suicidal ideations. She also reported of somatic complaints such as shivering, hot flashes, and pelvic pain with variable intensity….
…Due the suspected diagnosis of a depressive and anxiety disorder, the family doctor initiated an antidepressive medication with sertraline (100 mg OPD) and mirtazapine (7.5 mg OPD). This medication was taken daily for 6 months. In addition, lorazepam (0.5–1 mg) was prescribed as medication on demand. With medication, she reported from a minor improvement of sleep disturbances and from a remission of panic attacks, but still, higher levels of anxiety, depressed mood, inner restlessness, rumination and emotional lability persisted. Thus, the patient consulted a psychiatrist and underwent a supportive psychotherapy for five sessions in total. At this time, psychometric subjective measures of depressive mood conducted with the Beck depression inventory1 (BDI), revealed a sum-score of 42, indicating a severe depressive syndrome. After psychoeducation regarding depressive symptoms, the psychiatrist informed the patient about the potential association between changes in mood and the use of hormonal contraceptives. The psychiatrist also recommended the removal of the LNG-IUS. The gynecologist initially denied the potential association between the psychiatric symptoms and the LNG-IUS since changes in mood or anxiety were not evident during the first period of the LNG-IUS contraception. Nevertheless, the LNG-IUS was removed due to patient’s request…..
….Two weeks after removal of the LNG-IUS, psychiatric and in particular depressive symptoms improved markedly up to a BDI sum-score of 18, indicating a mild depressive syndrome, despite reduction of antidepressants. After two further weeks, the antidepressive medication was stopped. Four weeks after removal of the LNG-IUS, the patient reported that depressive symptoms and anxiety remitted completely (BDI sum-score: 6). In a 6- and 12-months follow-up, there were no clinically relevant symptoms of depression or anxiety (BDI: 2 respectively 2) observed….
Read the entire abstract on PubMed
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research.
References
Beatty MN, Blumenthal PD. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability. Ther Clin Risk Manag (2009) 5:561–74. 10.2147/tcrm.s5624 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Conz L, Mota BS, Bahamondes L, Teixeira Dória M, Françoise Mauricette Derchain S, Rieira R, et al. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (2020) 99(8):970–82. 10.1111/aogs.13817 - DOI - PubMed
Skovlund CW, Mørch LS, Kessing LV, Lange T, Lidegaard J. Association of hormonal contraception with suicide attempts and suicides. Am J Psychiatry (2018) 175:336–42. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17060616 - DOI - PubMed
Skovlund CW, Mørch LS, Kessing LV, Lidegaard Ø. Association of hormonal contraception with depression. JAMA Psychiatry (2016) 73:1154. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2387 - DOI - PubMed
Aleknaviciute J, Tulen JHM, De Rijke YB, Bouwkamp CG, van der Kroeg M, Timmermans M, et al. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device potentiates stress reactivity. Psychoneuroendocrinology (2017) 80:39–45. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.02.025 - DOI - PubMed
Slattery J, Morales D, Pinheiro L, Kurz X. Cohort study of psychiatric adverse events following exposure to levonorgestrel-containing intrauterine devices in UK general practice. Drug Saf (2018) 41:951–8. 10.1007/s40264-018-0683-x - DOI - PubMed
Cim N, Soysal S, Sayan S, Yildizhan B, Karaman E, Cetin O, et al. Two years follow-up of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding after insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Gynecol Obstet Invest (2018) 83:569–75. 10.1159/000480012 - DOI - PubMed
Bahamondes L, Brache V, Meirik O, Ali M, Habib N. Landoulsi S. A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls. Hum Reprod (2015) 30:2527–38. 10.1093/humrep/dev221 - DOI - PubMed
Endrikat J, Vilos G, Muysers C, Fortier M, Solomayer E, Lukkari-Lax E. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system provides a reliable, long-term treatment option for women with idiopathic menorrhagia. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2012) 285:117–21. 10.1007/s00404-011-1902-1 - DOI - PubMed
Gemzell-Danielsson K, Inki P, Boubli L, O’Flynn M, Kunz M, Heikinheimo O. Bleeding pattern and safety of consecutive use of the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)-a multicentre prospective study. Hum Reprod (2010) 25:354–9. 10.1093/humrep/dep426 - DOI - PubMed
Heikinheimo O, Inki P, Schmelter T, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Bleeding pattern and user satisfaction in second consecutive levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system users: Results of a prospective 5-year study. Hum Reprod (2014) 29:1182–8. 10.1093/humrep/deu063 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Bednarek PH, Jensen JT. Safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUS. Int J Womens Health (2009) 1:45–58. 10.2147/ijwh.s4350 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Fachinformation MIRENA® Intrauterinpessar mit Hormonabgabe 52 mg von Jenapharm GmbH & Co. KG, aufbereitet durch die Gelbe Liste Pharmindex Redaktion. Gelbe Liste Pharmindex Redaktion.
Beck A, Steer R, Ball R, Ranieri W. Comparison of beck depression 1 in psychiatric inventories -1A and - outpatients. J Pers Assess (1996) 67:588–97. 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703 - DOI - PubMed
The Uppsala Monitoring Centre The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardised case causality assessment. https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/WHOca... (accessed 25 Aug 2020).
Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet (2000) 356:1255–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9 - DOI - PubMed
Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberst EA, et al. DJ G. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther (1981) 30:239–45. 10.1038/clpt.1981.154 - DOI - PubMed
Machado-Vieira R, Baumann J, Wheeler-Castillo C, Latov D, Henter ID, Salvadore G, et al. The timing of antidepressant effects: A comparison of diverse pharmacological and somatic treatments. Pharmaceuticals (2010) 3:19–41. 10.3390/ph3010019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Sturridge F. Guillebaud J. A risk-benefit assessment of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Drug Saf (1996) 15:430–40. 10.2165/00002018-199615060-00006 - DOI - PubMed
Luukkainen T, Toivonen J. Levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as a method of contraception with therapeutic properties. Contraception (1995) 52:269–76. 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00210-2 - DOI - PubMed
Braverman PK, Adelman WP, Alderman EM, Breuner CC, Levine DA, Marcell AV, et al. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics (2014) 134:e1244–56. 10.1542/peds.2014-2299 - DOI
Committee Opinion No. 539 Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol (2012) 120:983–8. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b7d - DOI - PubMed
Bitzer J, Rapkin A, Soares CN. Managing the risks of mood symptoms with LNG-IUS: a clinical perspective. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care (2018) 23:321–5. 10.1080/13625187.2018.1521512 - DOI - PubMed
Soares CN, Zitek B. Reproductive hormone sensitivity and risk for depression across the female life cycle: A continuum of vulnerability? J Psychiatry Neurosci (2008) 33:331–43. - PMC - PubMed
Attia AM, Ibrahim MM, Abou-Setta AM. Role of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in effective contraception. Patient Prefer Adherence (2013) 7:777–85. 10.2147/PPA.S36948 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- 2018
- Abdominal Pain
- Abnormal Bleeding
- Access
- Allergies
- Anaphylaxis
- Anxiety & Depression
- Auto-immune Disease
- Back Pain
- Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)
- Bleeding
- blood clots
- Brain Fog
- Brain Swelling
- breast cancer
- Breastfeeding
- Cancer
- cervical cancer
- Choice
- Choking
- Coercion
- Copper 7
- Copper T
- Copper Toxicity
- Cost
- Difficulty Swallowing
- Digestive Issues
- Discharge
- Early Removal
- eczema
- Endometrial Cancer
- Expulsion
- Fatigue
- Fear
- Fertility
- Gene Mutation
- Gravigard
- hair loss
- Headache & Migraine
- Heart Palpitations
- High Blood Pressure
- HIV
- Improvement after Removal
- Increase in Use
- Inflammation
- Informed Consent
- Internet Forums
- Intolerences
- Irritability & Mood Changes
- Jaydess
- Kyleena
- Lung Cancer
- Menopausal Symptoms
- Migration
- Mirena
- Missing Strings
- MRI
- Muscle Pains & Aches
- Non-Use
- osteoporosis
- Ovarian Cancer
- Pain
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Paragard
- Paranoia
- Pelvic Pain
- Perforation
- PID & Infections
- Placement
- PMDD
- Post-Abortion
- Postpartum Insertion
- pregnancy
- Prostaglandins
- Rashes
- Reproductive Justice
- Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
- Self Removal
- Sex Life
- sexual dysfunction
- Shortness of Breath
- Skin Problems & Jaundice
- Skyla
- STI Risk
- Stroke & Heart Attack
- suicide
- Surgical Removal
- Tubal Ligation
- Vertigo & Dizziness
- Weight Gain