Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intrauterine Contraception and Tubal Ligation
/February 23, 2022
Journal of General internal Medicine
February 23, 2022
Journal of General internal Medicine
Read MoreThe collective evidence, including that from a large high-quality RCT, does not indicate an increased risk of HIV acquisition among users of Cu-IUDs. human immunodeficiency virus; intrauterine devices.
Read MoreGiven the current gap in the literature and trends in LNG-IUD use in nulliparous young women, studies are needed that specifically look at the interaction of nulliparity, long-term use of LNG-IUD, and return to normal fertility. Herein, we review the available literature on the mechanism of action of IUDs with a specific focus on the effect on endometrial gene expression profile changes associated with IUDs.
Read MoreIn our current climate focused on improving access to IUDs, it is essential to address and reduce barriers to IUD removal when desired, in order to preserve reproductive autonomy.
Lots of references to studies about Copper IUDs .
Read MoreRead MoreReasons for discontinuation of IUD:
Bleeding Pattern (27.5%), Pain (25%), Weight Gain (5%); Other Reasons (42.5%)
Read MorePregnancies in women who conceive with a removed or retained copper IUD are at an increased risk for short-term adverse perinatal outcomes, especially preterm delivery. For pregnancies that continued to at least 22 weeks, we found no benefit in IUD removal. However, the risk of long-term neuropsychiatric hospitalizations is not increased among offspring of these women.
Read MoreAmong women who had their PPCuIUD removed, almost two thirds (64.9%) cited associated side effects like bleeding, pain in abdomen and discharge as the primary reason for removal.
“No other contraceptive method has undergone so rapid and thorough a change of medical reputation as that experienced by intrauterine devices over the past few years.” These words from United States-based contraceptive researcher Christopher Tietze in 1966 also characterize the last 10 years in the United States.”
Read MoreRead MoreBecause adolescents are at higher risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), obstetrician–gynecologists should continue to follow standard guidelines for STI screening. They should advise adolescents who choose LARC methods to use male or female condoms consistently (dual method use) to decrease the risk of STIs, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Obstetrician–gynecologists should counsel all sexually active adolescents who do not seek pregnancy on the range of reversible contraceptive methods, including LARC, and should help make these contraceptives readily accessible to them.
Read MoreRecent levonorgestrel-IUD use may be associated with CIN2, a lesion with a high rate of regression, but not CIN3, which is considered a true pre-cancerous lesion. The observed association between levonorgestrel-IUDs and CIN2+ was modest but warrants further investigation. It may have clinical importance for contraceptive counseling if this finding is shown to be consistent across other studies and other populations.
Read MoreThe overall perforation rate was 2.1 per 1000 insertions for LNG-IUS users 1.6 per 1000 insertions for copper-IUD users……. LNG-IUS users had a borderline higher risk of perforation compared with copper-IUD users.
Forty-five (58%) of the 77 perforations were associated with suspected risk factors……
Breastfeeding…… and time since delivery remained significant risk factors in perforations detected after 12 months.
No perforations resulted in serious injury to intra-abdominal or pelvic structures.
Read MoreWe encourage contraceptive counseling and removal protocols that directly address historical reproductive injustices and that honor patients' wishes.
Read More“Retracted and detached strings were observed somewhat more often in women wearing Cu-7-IUD's. The number of such cases was, however, not large enough to warrant a statistical comparison.”
Read More“There was a decrease in contraceptive effectiveness after 12 more months' use.”
Read More“Compared with oral contraceptives copper IUDs have less severe side effects but less safety at the same time-especially for the younger fertile age group. Therefore they should be offered to young nulliparous women only for a limited period of time.”