“$231 … to pull a string!!!” American IUD users’ reasons for IUD self-removal: An analysis of internet forums
/Read MoreThis study describes the reasons for IUD self-removal as documented in internet forums by IUD users discussing self-removal.
Read MoreThis study describes the reasons for IUD self-removal as documented in internet forums by IUD users discussing self-removal.
Read MoreIn our current climate focused on improving access to IUDs, it is essential to address and reduce barriers to IUD removal when desired, in order to preserve reproductive autonomy.
Read MoreNo conclusions can be made regarding the clinical utility of routine pathology for removed intrauterine devices or cost-effectiveness of routine pathology for therapeutic abortion or removed intrauterine devices, due to the lack of literature identified for these questions. No guidelines regarding routine pathology for removed intrauterine devices were identified. As such, no conclusion can be made.
Read MoreReasons for discontinuation of IUD:
Bleeding Pattern (27.5%), Pain (25%), Weight Gain (5%); Other Reasons (42.5%)
Read MoreA 22-year-old G1P1 Caucasian female had hysteroscopic removal of a perforated intrauterine device during which the steroid reservoir of the intrauterine device was lost. Isolated steroid reservoirs are radiolucent on plain film radiography. We located the reservoir in the peritoneal cavity with magnetic resonance imaging and removed it via laparoscopy.
Read MoreBaseline generalized pelvic pain may not be a risk factor for IUD discontinuation within one year of placement.
Read MoreA 28-year-old woman presented with a malpositioned intrauterine device (IUD) that was fragmented and significantly entrenched within the cervical canal and myometrium. IUD malposition with concomitant device fragmentation and embedded segments, albeit rare, should be a consideration given the device's prevalence.
Read MoreWe found that women's perceptions of how their method affects their sex life were associated with contraceptive continuation over time. Sexual acceptability should receive more attention in both contraceptive research and counseling.
Read MoreIUD self-removal is an option that some patients may be interested in. Addressing concerns about safety may make self-removal more appealing to some patients. Addressing physicians' concern about "hasty" removal may require additional training so that providers are better able to support patients' decision-making around contraceptive use. Implications: The option of self-removal could have a positive impact on reproductive autonomy and patient-decision making.
Read MoreBecause adolescents are at higher risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), obstetrician–gynecologists should continue to follow standard guidelines for STI screening. They should advise adolescents who choose LARC methods to use male or female condoms consistently (dual method use) to decrease the risk of STIs, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Obstetrician–gynecologists should counsel all sexually active adolescents who do not seek pregnancy on the range of reversible contraceptive methods, including LARC, and should help make these contraceptives readily accessible to them.
Read MoreWe encourage contraceptive counseling and removal protocols that directly address historical reproductive injustices and that honor patients' wishes.